Defining Goals: New Beginnings vs. Continuing Journeys

I recently participated in a discussion about goals, specifically debating what qualifies as a goal. Does a goal need to focus on something new to be considered valid? Can continuing an existing activity also count as a goal?

Some may view this debate as semantic and not worth discussing. However, for those of us who enjoy contemplating and encouraging goal-setting, it’s an intriguing topic.

In my experience, a goal typically represents something new you want to start or try. At this point in time, you might have developed a sub-goal related to achieving a larger objective. For instance, this year, I plan to hike 100 km as part of my broader goal of hiking the entire Bruce Trail. In this context, I am continuing with the same overarching goal. However, I believe this differs from setting a goal to hike 100 km year after year without any connection to a larger purpose.

Once we begin an activity, we may strive to continue it, but I encourage individuals to also add something new or different to their personal list of goals. There are situations where I support the idea of continuing an activity as a valid goal, including:

• When there is a significant risk that the activity may not continue due to life circumstances.

• When health or aging factors hinder the continuation of the activity.

• When a person benefits from formal structure and motivation to maintain the activity.

That said, this is just my perspective, and it reflects my current thoughts. I don’t believe there is a definitive 'right' answer, but understanding your own perspective and definition can be beneficial, especially if you are coaching or supporting others in identifying their goals. So, what are your thoughts? What fits your definition of a goal—continuing something, starting something new, or both?